A recent social media argument between two renowned Malayalam writers, Benyamin and K.R. Meera, has gone viral, igniting debates in literary and political circles. The controversy began with a Facebook post discussing Mahatma Gandhi’s legacy and the role of the Indian National Congress (INC).
What Sparked the Controversy?
K.R. Meera shared a news article about the Hindu Mahasabha honoring Nathuram Godse, Gandhi’s assassin. In her post, she claimed, “Congress has been trying to erase Gandhism for 75 years. Now comes the Hindu Mahasabha.” She suggested that the INC had also contributed to diminishing Gandhi’s ideals.
Benyamin’s Response Goes Viral
Benyamin strongly disagreed and wrote, “What K.R. Meera said is nonsense. Her statement lacks awareness of political history. Worse, it helps right-wing propaganda.” He argued that criticizing Congress in this manner could inadvertently benefit right-wing groups.
K.R. Meera Fires Back
Meera responded sharply, accusing Benyamin of attempting to silence her voice. She questioned why he had not spoken out against the diminishing influence of Gandhi’s principles. She also implied that Benyamin might be attempting to maintain favor with both Congress and right-wing supporters.
Public Reaction and Social Media Buzz
The exchange quickly gained traction, trending on social media as people took sides. Some supported Meera, arguing that Congress had distanced itself from Gandhi’s values. Others defended Benyamin, believing Meera’s statement could play into right-wing narratives.
The Larger Implications
This debate highlights the deep political and ideological divides within India’s intellectual community. While both authors are widely respected, their public clash underscores the complexities of discussing history, politics, and accountability in modern times.
Conclusion
The Benyamin-K.R. Meera controversy reflects the ongoing struggle to define Gandhi’s legacy and the political forces at play in India. As the debate continues, it raises critical questions about free speech, historical interpretation, and the responsibilities of writers in shaping public discourse.
